↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial Persistence

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Bacterial Persistence'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Bacterial Persistence
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Persisters: Methods for Isolation and Identifying Contributing Factors-A Review.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Bacterial Persistence
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Bacterial Persistence
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A Microplate-Based System as In Vitro Model of Biofilm Growth and Quantification.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Protocol for Determination of the Persister Subpopulation in Candida Albicans Biofilms.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Bacterial Persistence
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Bacterial Persistence
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Single-Cell Detection and Collection of Persister Bacteria in a Directly Accessible Femtoliter Droplet Array.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 A Whole-Cell-Based High-Throughput Screening Method to Identify Molecules Targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Persister Cells.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Functional Analysis of the Role of Toxin-Antitoxin (TA) Loci in Bacterial Persistence.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Experimental Evolution of Escherichia coli Persister Levels Using Cyclic Antibiotic Treatments
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 In Vitro Models for the Study of the Intracellular Activity of Antibiotics
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Bacterial Persistence
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Bacterial Persistence
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Population Dynamics Analysis of Ciprofloxacin-Persistent S. Typhimurium Cells in a Mouse Model for Salmonella Diarrhea.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Bacterial Persistence
Attention for Chapter 10: A Whole-Cell-Based High-Throughput Screening Method to Identify Molecules Targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Persister Cells.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Whole-Cell-Based High-Throughput Screening Method to Identify Molecules Targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Persister Cells.
Chapter number 10
Book title
Bacterial Persistence
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2854-5_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2853-8, 978-1-4939-2854-5
Authors

Liebens, Veerle, Defraine, Valerie, Fauvart, Maarten, Veerle Liebens, Valerie Defraine, Maarten Fauvart

Abstract

Despite its clinical relevance and the fact that the phenomenon of persistence was discovered in the 1940s, little is known about the mechanisms behind persister cell formation. Research in this field has mainly focused on the model organism Escherichia coli and few genetic determinants of persistence have been described in other bacterial species, impairing the development of target-based strategies to combat these antibiotic-tolerant cells. In this chapter we describe a top-down large-scale screening method capable of specifically identifying small molecule compounds that, in combination with conventional antibiotics, significantly reduce the persister fraction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The method is readily adaptable for other species. Further characterization and analysis of the mode of action of the identified compounds can provide additional insight into the mechanisms behind persister formation and can guide the development of future anti-persister therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,223,715
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,200
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,549
of 393,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#256
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.