You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
3D Printing and Biofabrication for Load Bearing Tissue Engineering.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Engineering Mineralized and Load Bearing Tissues
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-22345-2_1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-922344-5, 978-3-31-922345-2
|
| Authors |
Jeong, Claire G, Atala, Anthony, Claire G. Jeong, Anthony Atala |
| Abstract |
Cell-based direct biofabrication and 3D bioprinting is becoming a dominant technological platform and is suggested as a new paradigm for twenty-first century tissue engineering. These techniques may be our next step in surpassing the hurdles and limitations of conventional scaffold-based tissue engineering, and may offer the industrial potential of tissue engineered products especially for load bearing tissues. Here we present a topically focused review regarding the fundamental concepts, state of the art, and perspectives of this new technology and field of biofabrication and 3D bioprinting, specifically focused on tissue engineering of load bearing tissues such as bone, cartilage, osteochondral and dental tissue engineering. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,295,501
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,969
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,893
of 353,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#189
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.