↓ Skip to main content

Engineering Mineralized and Load Bearing Tissues

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Microfabrication of Cell-Laden Hydrogels for Engineering Mineralized and Load Bearing Tissues.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Microfabrication of Cell-Laden Hydrogels for Engineering Mineralized and Load Bearing Tissues.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Engineering Mineralized and Load Bearing Tissues
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22345-2_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-922344-5, 978-3-31-922345-2
Authors

Li, Chia-Cheng, Kharaziha, Mahshid, Min, Christine, Maas, Richard, Nikkhah, Mehdi, Chia-Cheng Li, Mahshid Kharaziha, Christine Min, Richard Maas, Mehdi Nikkhah

Abstract

Microengineering technologies and advanced biomaterials have extensive applications in the field of regenerative medicine. In this chapter, we review the integration of microfabrication techniques and hydrogel-based biomaterials in the field of dental, bone, and cartilage tissue engineering. We primarily discuss the major features that make hydrogels attractive candidates to mimic extracellular matrix (ECM), and we consider the benefits of three-dimensional (3D) culture systems for tissue engineering applications. We then focus on the fundamental principles of microfabrication techniques including photolithography, soft lithography and bioprinting approaches. Lastly, we summarize recent research on microengineering cell-laden hydrogel constructs for dental, bone and cartilage regeneration, and discuss future applications of microfabrication techniques for load-bearing tissue engineering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Engineering 9 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Materials Science 2 4%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,295,501
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,969
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,893
of 353,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#189
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.