↓ Skip to main content

Plant Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant Bioinformatics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Using GenBank.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, the Manually Annotated Section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase: How to Use the Entry View.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 KEGG Bioinformatics Resource for Plant Genomics and Metabolomics.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Plant Bioinformatics
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Plant Ontology: A Tool for Plant Genomics.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Ensembl Plants: Integrating Tools for Visualizing, Mining, and Analyzing Plant Genomics Data.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Gramene: A Resource for Comparative Analysis of Plants Genomes and Pathways.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 PGSB/MIPS Plant Genome Information Resources and Concepts for the Analysis of Complex Grass Genomes.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 MaizeGDB: The Maize Genetics and Genomics Database.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 WheatGenome.info: A Resource for Wheat Genomics Resource.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 User Guidelines for the Brassica Database: BRAD.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 TAG Sequence Identification of Genomic Regions Using TAGdb.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Short Read Alignment Using SOAP2.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Tablet: Visualizing Next-Generation Sequence Assemblies and Mappings.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Analysis of Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Data.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Skim-Based Genotyping by Sequencing Using a Double Haploid Population to Call SNPs, Infer Gene Conversions, and Improve Genome Assemblies.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Finding and Characterizing Repeats in Plant Genomes.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Analysis of RNA-Seq Data Using TopHat and Cufflinks.
Attention for Chapter 3: KEGG Bioinformatics Resource for Plant Genomics and Metabolomics.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
KEGG Bioinformatics Resource for Plant Genomics and Metabolomics.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Plant Bioinformatics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3167-5_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3166-8, 978-1-4939-3167-5
Authors

Kanehisa, Minoru, Minoru Kanehisa

Editors

David Edwards

Abstract

In the era of high-throughput biology it is necessary to develop not only elaborate computational methods but also well-curated databases that can be used as reference for data interpretation. KEGG ( http://www.kegg.jp/ ) is such a reference knowledge base with two specific aims. One is to compile knowledge on high-level functions of the cell and the organism in terms of the molecular interaction and reaction networks, which is implemented in KEGG pathway maps, BRITE functional hierarchies, and KEGG modules. The other is to expand knowledge on genes and proteins involved in the molecular networks from experimentally observed organisms to other organisms using the concept of orthologs, which is implemented in the KEGG Orthology (KO) system. Thus, KEGG is a generic resource applicable to all organisms and enables interpretation of high-level functions from genomic and molecular data. Here we first present a brief overview of the entire KEGG resource, and then give an introduction of how to use KEGG in plant genomics and metabolomics research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Chemistry 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,700,050
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,632
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,102
of 393,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#463
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.