↓ Skip to main content

Candida Species

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Staphylococcus-Candida Interaction Models: Antibiotic Resistance Testing and Host Interactions.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Staphylococcus-Candida Interaction Models: Antibiotic Resistance Testing and Host Interactions.
Chapter number 11
Book title
Candida Species
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3052-4_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3051-7, 978-1-4939-3052-4
Authors

Scheres, Nina, Krom, Bastiaan P, Nina Scheres, Bastiaan P. Krom

Abstract

The fungus Candida albicans and bacterium Staphylococcus aureus can coexist in polymicrobial biofilms. S. aureus attaches strongly to hyphae, but not to the yeast form, of C. albicans with important consequences for virulence. Hyphae-associated S. aureus is less susceptible to antibiotic treatment. Furthermore, co-inoculation of C. albicans and S. aureus causes more severe and widespread infection than either microorganism alone. In this chapter, a basic in vitro model for studying the interaction between C. albicans hyphae and S. aureus is presented, which makes use of a fluorescently labeled S. aureus strain. Furthermore, two protocols are described that allow investigation of the effect of C. albicans and S. aureus interaction on antibiotic susceptibility or on interactions with the host. The latter focuses on phagocytosis of C. albicans-adhered S. aureus by macrophages. The protocols presented here may serve as a starting point to study the interaction of C. albicans with various other bacterial species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,776,263
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,239
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,667
of 393,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#752
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.