↓ Skip to main content

Cell Biology and Translational Medicine, Volume 1

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 214: Stem Cells in Alzheimer’s Disease: Current Standing and Future Challenges
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Stem Cells in Alzheimer’s Disease: Current Standing and Future Challenges
Chapter number 214
Book title
Cell Biology and Translational Medicine, Volume 1
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/5584_2018_214
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-993866-0, 978-3-31-993867-7
Authors

Haitham Salem, Gabriela D. Colpo, Antonio L. Teixeira, Salem, Haitham, Colpo, Gabriela D., Teixeira, Antonio L.

Abstract

To date, there is no definitive treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD). The realm of stem cells is very promising in regenerative medicine, particularly for neurodegenerative diseases. Various types of stem cells have been used in preclinical/clinical trials for AD aiming the development of an elusive disease modifying therapy. Over the last decade, much knowledge has been gained in this field regarding types of cells, routes and timing of administration, and outcomes of stem cells-based strategies for AD. In this chapter, we will trace the state of art and the challenges facing the use of stem cells in AD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Neuroscience 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Philosophy 1 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,240,709
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#554
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,729
of 442,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#17
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.