↓ Skip to main content

Cell Biology and Translational Medicine, Volume 1

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 173: Clinical Applications of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells – Stato Attuale
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Clinical Applications of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells – Stato Attuale
Chapter number 173
Book title
Cell Biology and Translational Medicine, Volume 1
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/5584_2018_173
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-993866-0, 978-3-31-993867-7
Authors

Chavali Kavyasudha, Dannie Macrin, K. N. ArulJothi, Joel P. Joseph, M. K. Harishankar, Arikketh Devi, Kavyasudha, Chavali, Macrin, Dannie, ArulJothi, K. N., Joseph, Joel P., Harishankar, M. K., Devi, Arikketh

Abstract

In an adult human body, somatic stem cells are present in small amounts in almost all organs with the function of general maintenance and prevention of premature aging. But, these stem cells are not pluripotent and are unable to regenerate large cellular loss caused by infarctions or fractures especially in cells with limited replicative ability such as neurons and cardiomyocytes. These limitations gave rise to the idea of inducing pluripotency to adult somatic cells and thereby restoring their regeneration, replication and plasticity. Though many trials and research were focused on inducing pluripotency, a solid breakthrough was achieved by Yamanaka in 2006. Yamanaka's research identified 4 genes (OCT-4, SOX-2, KLF-4 and c-MYC) as the key requisite for inducing pluripotency in any somatic cells (iPSCs). Our study, reviews the major methods used for inducing pluripotency, differentiation into specific cell types and their application in both cell regeneration and disease modelling. We have also highlighted the current status of iPSCs in clinical applications by analysing the registered clinical trials. We believe that this review will assist the researchers to decide the parameters such as induction method and focus their efforts towards clinical application of iPSCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 28%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,493,741
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,517
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,806
of 442,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#111
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.