↓ Skip to main content

Celiac Disease

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Celiac Disease'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Celiac Disease: Background and Historical Context
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Celiac Disease: Diagnosis
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Generating Transgenic Mouse Models for Studying Celiac Disease
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Study Designs for Exploring the Non-HLA Genetics in Celiac Disease
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Twenty-Four Hour Ex Vivo Culture of Celiac Duodenal Biopsies
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Celiac Disease
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Flow Cytometric Analysis of Human Small Intestinal Lymphoid Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Adaptation of a Cell-Based High Content Screening System for the In-Depth Analysis of Celiac Biopsy Tissue
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 HLA Genotyping: Methods for the Identification of the HLA-DQ2,-DQ8 Heterodimers Implicated in Celiac Disease (CD) Susceptibility
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Detecting Allelic Expression Imbalance at Candidate Genes Using 5' Exonuclease Genotyping Technology.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Gene Expression Profiling of Celiac Biopsies and Peripheral Blood Monocytes Using Taqman Assays
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Cloning Gene Variants and Reporter Assays
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Epigenetic Methodologies for the Study of Celiac Disease.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Candidate Gene Knockdown in Celiac Disease
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Perl One-Liners: Bridging the Gap Between Large Data Sets and Analysis Tools.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Bioinformatic Analysis of Antigenic Proteins in Celiac Disease
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Quality Control Procedures for High-Throughput Genetic Association Studies.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Quality Control and Analysis of NGS RNA Sequencing Data.
Attention for Chapter 18: Quality Control and Analysis of NGS RNA Sequencing Data.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Quality Control and Analysis of NGS RNA Sequencing Data.
Chapter number 18
Book title
Celiac Disease
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2839-2_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2838-5, 978-1-4939-2839-2
Authors

Quinn, Emma M, McManus, Ross, Emma M. Quinn, Ross McManus, Quinn, Emma M.

Abstract

Transcriptome sequencing, where RNA is isolated, converted to library of cDNA fragments, and sequenced using next-generation sequencing technology, has become the method of choice for the genome-wide characterization of mRNA levels. It offers a more accurate quantification of transcript levels than array-based methods, but also has the added benefit of allowing the discovery of novel gene/transcripts, alternative splice junctions, and novel RNAs. In addition, RNA sequencing may be used to investigate differential gene expression, allelic imbalance, eQTL mapping, RNA editing, RNA-protein interactions, and alternative splicing. A number of statistical methods and tools are available for differential expression analysis using RNA sequencing data and these are continually being developed and improved to handle more complex experimental designs. This chapter describes an example workflow for the quality control and analysis of raw RNA sequencing reads for the purposes of differential gene expression analysis, followed by pathway/enrichment analysis of significantly different genes. The methods and tools described are just one example of how this analysis can be conducted, but they can be applied to most standard RNA sequencing studies of differential gene expression. The methods covered are based on Illumina HiSeq single-end 50 bp reads. However, all programs used are capable of working with paired-end data, subsequent to minor adaptations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Computer Science 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,173,005
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,113
of 13,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,901
of 362,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#317
of 992 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,828 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 992 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.