You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
A Microplate-Based System as In Vitro Model of Biofilm Growth and Quantification.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 5 |
Book title |
Bacterial Persistence
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2854-5_5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2853-8, 978-1-4939-2854-5
|
Authors |
Vandecandelaere, Ilse, Van Acker, Heleen, Coenye, Tom, Ilse Vandecandelaere, Heleen Van Acker, Tom Coenye, Acker, Heleen Van |
Abstract |
We describe a 96-well microtiter plate-based system as an in vitro model for biofilm formation and quantification. Although in vitro assays are artificial systems and thus significantly differ from in vivo conditions, they represent an important tool to evaluate biofilm formation and the effect of compounds on biofilms. Stainings to evaluate the amount of biomass (crystal violet staining) and the number of metabolically active cells (resazurin assay) are discussed and specific attention is paid to the use of this model to quantify persisters in sessile populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 20% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,294,248
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,917
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,601
of 393,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,053
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.