↓ Skip to main content

Copy Number Variants

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Copy Number Variants'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Identification of Copy Number Variants from SNP Arrays Using PennCNV
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Using SAAS-CNV to Detect and Characterize Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Cancer Genomes from Next Generation Sequencing and SNP Array Data
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Statistical Detection of Genome Differences Based on CNV Segments
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequence CNV Detection Using Read Depth
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Read Depth Analysis to Identify CNV in Bacteria Using CNOGpro
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Using HaMMLET for Bayesian Segmentation of WGS Read-Depth Data
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Split-Read Indel and Structural Variant Calling Using PINDEL
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Detecting Small Inversions Using SRinversion
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Detection of CNVs in NGS Data Using VS-CNV
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Structural Variant Breakpoint Detection with novoBreak
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Use of RAPTR-SV to Identify SVs from Read Pairing and Split Read Signatures
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Versatile Identification of Copy Number Variants with Canvas
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Randomized Iterative Approach for SV Discovery with SVelter
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Analysis of Population-Genetic Properties of Copy Number Variations
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Validation of Genomic Structural Variants Through Long Sequencing Technologies
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Structural Variation Detection and Analysis Using Bionano Optical Mapping
Attention for Chapter 12: Versatile Identification of Copy Number Variants with Canvas
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Versatile Identification of Copy Number Variants with Canvas
Chapter number 12
Book title
Copy Number Variants
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8666-8_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8665-1, 978-1-4939-8666-8
Authors

Sergii Ivakhno, Eric Roller, Ivakhno, Sergii, Roller, Eric

Abstract

Versatile and efficient variant calling tools are needed to analyze large-scale sequencing datasets. In particular, identification of copy number changes remains a challenging task due to their complexity, susceptibility to sequencing biases, variation in coverage data and dependence on genome-wide sample properties, such as tumor polyploidy, polyclonality in cancer samples, or frequency of de novo variation in germline genomes of pedigrees. The frequent need of core sequencing facilities to process samples from both normal and tumor sources favors multipurpose variant calling tools with functionality to process these diverse sets within a single software framework. This not only simplifies the overall bioinformatics workflow but also streamlines maintenance by shortening the software update cycle and requiring only limited staff training. Here we introduce Canvas, a tool for identification of copy number changes from diverse sequencing experiments including whole-genome matched tumor-normal, small pedigree, and single-sample normal resequencing, as well as whole-exome matched and unmatched tumor-normal studies. In addition to variant calling, Canvas infers genome-wide parameters such as cancer ploidy, purity, and heterogeneity. It provides fast and easy-to-run workflows that can scale to thousands of samples and can be easily incorporated into variant calling pipelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Unspecified 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,977
of 13,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,510
of 442,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,194
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.