↓ Skip to main content

Olfactory Receptors

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Olfactory Receptors'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 CD36 Neuronal Identity in the Olfactory Epithelium
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Deorphanization of Olfactory Trace Amine-Associated Receptors
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 3 (GRK3) in Olfaction
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Virus-Mediated Overexpression of Vomeronasal Receptors and Functional Assessment by Live-Cell Calcium Imaging
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Calcium Imaging of Individual Olfactory Sensory Neurons from Intact Olfactory Turbinates
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting of Olfactory Sensory Neuron Subpopulations
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Numerical Models and In Vitro Assays to Study Odorant Receptors
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 High-Throughput Odorant Receptor Deorphanization Via Phospho-S6 Ribosomal Protein Immunoprecipitation and mRNA Profiling
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Patch-Clamp Recordings from Mouse Olfactory Sensory Neurons
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 In Vivo Electrophysiological Recordings of Olfactory Receptor Neuron Units and Electro-olfactograms in Anesthetized Rats
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Suction Pipette Technique: An Electrophysiological Tool to Study Olfactory Receptor-Dependent Signal Transduction
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Odor-Induced Electrical and Calcium Signals from Olfactory Sensory Neurons In Situ
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Long-Term Plasticity at the Mitral and Tufted Cell to Granule Cell Synapse of the Olfactory Bulb Investigated with a Custom Multielectrode in Acute Brain Slice Preparations
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Multisite Recording of Local Field Potentials in Awake, Free-Moving Mice
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 In Vivo Two-Photon Imaging of the Olfactory System in Insects
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Approaches for Assessing Olfaction in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Methods in Rodent Chemosensory Cognition
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Bioelectronic Nose Using Olfactory Receptor-Embedded Nanodiscs
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Tracking Odorant Plumes
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Generative Biophysical Modeling of Dynamical Networks in the Olfactory System
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Behavioral Assays in the Study of Olfaction: A Practical Guide
Attention for Chapter 19: Tracking Odorant Plumes
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Tracking Odorant Plumes
Chapter number 19
Book title
Olfactory Receptors
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8609-5_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8608-8, 978-1-4939-8609-5
Authors

Matthew A. Reidenbach, Reidenbach, Matthew A.

Abstract

Chemical signals are primarily distributed throughout aquatic environments by processes that are affected by turbulence. Turbulence continually stirs and mixes chemical odorants into complex, filamentous structures that are sampled by organisms. These odorant signals are critical for survival and/or reproductive success of most aquatic animals, and the time varying spatial structure of velocity and concentration offers valuable guidance cues while navigating in a plume. Two separate techniques are described to simultaneously measure a turbulent odor plume on a scale relevant to the chemosensors and mechanosensors located along the antennules of aquatic organisms. The first, planar laser induced fluorescence (PLIF), is used to quantify odorant concentrations, while the second, particle image velocimetry (PIV), is used to measure turbulent fluid velocities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 25%
Physics and Astronomy 1 25%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,987
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,849
of 442,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.