↓ Skip to main content

Improving Outcomes for Breast Cancer Survivors

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Improving Outcomes for Breast Cancer Survivors'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Breast Cancer Survivorship: Where Are We Today?
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Special Issues in Younger Women with Breast Cancer
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Special Issues in Older Women with Breast Cancer
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Breast Cancer Among Special Populations: Disparities in Care Across the Cancer Control Continuum
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Symptoms: Fatigue and Cognitive Dysfunction
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Symptoms: Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Symptoms: Aromatase Inhibitor Induced Arthralgias
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Symptoms: Lymphedema
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Symptoms: Menopause, Infertility, and Sexual Health
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Host Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence: Genetic, Epigenetic and Biologic Factors and Breast Cancer Outcomes.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Comorbidities and Their Management: Potential Impact on Breast Cancer Outcomes
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Breast Cancer Outcomes: Current Controversies and Research Recommendations.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Risk Reduction from Weight Management and Physical Activity Interventions
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Prevention and Treatment of Cardiac Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Survivors.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Psychological Adjustment in Breast Cancer Survivors
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Quality of Care, Including Survivorship Care Plans.
Attention for Chapter 12: Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Breast Cancer Outcomes: Current Controversies and Research Recommendations.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Breast Cancer Outcomes: Current Controversies and Research Recommendations.
Chapter number 12
Book title
Improving Outcomes for Breast Cancer Survivors
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16366-6_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-916365-9, 978-3-31-916366-6
Authors

Goodwin, Pamela J, Ambrosone, Christine B, Hong, Chi-Chen, Pamela J. Goodwin, Christine B. Ambrosone, Chi-Chen Hong, Goodwin, Pamela J., Ambrosone, Christine B.

Abstract

Lifestyle factors, particularly obesity, have been associated with poor breast cancer outcomes in a large number of observational studies. Despite a growing body of research, controversy exists regarding obesity associations across breast cancer subtypes and the importance of obesity versus physical activity and dietary composition in determining breast cancer outcome. These controversies are reviewed and the complex biologic nature of the association of obesity with breast cancer addressed. Potential mediators, including insulin, estrogens, adipokines and inflammation markers are identified. Relevant prognostic findings of previous research involving dietary, physical activity and weight loss interventions are summarized. A broad-based program of research is outlined, highlighting the need for a randomized trial of weight loss that is adequately powered to examine survival effects, as well as correlative and preclinical research to investigate mediators and mechanisms of obesity effects on breast cancer outcomes. Finally, potential contributions of alcohol intake and tobacco use in breast cancer survivors are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 23 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 24 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,011,421
of 23,940,793 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,176
of 5,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,911
of 359,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#95
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.