You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
A Hypothesis of Brain-to-Brain Coupling in Interactive New Media Art and Games Using Brain-Computer Interfaces
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 9 |
| Book title |
Serious Games
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-19126-3_9 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-919125-6, 978-3-31-919126-3
|
| Authors |
Polina Zioga, Paul Chapman, Minhua Mae, Frank Pollick, Zioga, Polina, Chapman, Paul, Mae, Minhua, Pollick, Frank |
| Editors |
Stefan Göbel, Minhua Ma, Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge, Manuel Fradinho Oliveira, Josef Wiemeyer, Viktor Wendel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 27% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,583,914
of 24,707,218 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,279
of 8,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,299
of 271,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#51
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,707,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.