↓ Skip to main content

Glucocorticoid Signaling

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Regulatory Actions of Glucocorticoid Hormones: From Organisms to Mechanisms
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Regulatory Actions of Glucocorticoid Hormones: From Organisms to Mechanisms
Chapter number 1
Book title
Glucocorticoid Signaling
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2895-8_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2894-1, 978-1-4939-2895-8
Authors

Daryl K. Granner, Jen-Chywan Wang, Keith R. Yamamoto, Granner, Daryl K., Wang, Jen-Chywan, Yamamoto, Keith R.

Abstract

The history of glucocorticoid hormone research is an excellent example of "bedside to bench" investigation. It started with two very insightful clinical observations. Thomas Addison described the syndrome of what came to be known as adrenal hormone insufficiency and Harvey Cushing the syndrome of glucocorticoid hormone excess. These dramatic and life-threatening conditions spawned 150 years of active research that has involved many disciplines; indeed some of the fundamental observations of molecular biology are the result of this work. We have a fundamental knowledge of how glucocorticoids regulate gene transcription, their major effect. The challenge facing current and future investigators is to discern how to use this information to make these powerful therapeutic agents safer and more effective.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 28%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,554,098
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,237
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,472
of 354,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#60
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.