↓ Skip to main content

Amino Acid Fermentation

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 26: Glutamate Fermentation-2: Mechanism of l -Glutamate Overproduction in Corynebacterium glutamicum
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Glutamate Fermentation-2: Mechanism of l -Glutamate Overproduction in Corynebacterium glutamicum
Chapter number 26
Book title
Amino Acid Fermentation
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/10_2016_26
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-4-43-156518-5, 978-4-43-156520-8
Authors

Takashi Hirasawa, Masaaki Wachi, Hirasawa, Takashi, Wachi, Masaaki

Abstract

The nonpathogenic coryneform bacterium, Corynebacterium glutamicum, was isolated as an L-glutamate-overproducing microorganism by Japanese researchers and is currently utilized in various amino acid fermentation processes. L-Glutamate production by C. glutamicum is induced by limitation of biotin and addition of fatty acid ester surfactants and β-lactam antibiotics. These treatments affect the cell surface structures of C. glutamicum. After the discovery of C. glutamicum, many researchers have investigated the underlying mechanism of L-glutamate overproduction with respect to the cell surface structures of this organism. Furthermore, metabolic regulation during L-glutamate overproduction by C. glutamicum, particularly, the relationship between central carbon metabolism and L-glutamate biosynthesis, has been investigated. Recently, the role of a mechanosensitive channel protein in L-glutamate overproduction has been reported. In this chapter, mechanisms of L-glutamate overproduction by C. glutamicum have been reviewed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Engineering 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,554,098
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#55
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,839
of 394,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.