↓ Skip to main content

Biobanking in the 21st Century

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: Nursing and Biobanking
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Nursing and Biobanking
Chapter number 12
Book title
Biobanking in the 21st Century
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20579-3_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-920578-6, 978-3-31-920579-3
Authors

Jennifer Sanner, Erica Yu, Krystle Nomie, Sanner, Jennifer, Yu, Erica, Nomie, Krystle

Abstract

Nurses are a pivotal component of the translational research movement and apply scientific discoveries to the healthcare and clinical practice fields. Biobanking is also an important factor in furthering translational research by providing biospecimens and related clinical data to the research community. The effectiveness of any biobanking effort necessitates the enrollment of large numbers of diverse participants, which signifies a need for the nursing profession to secure the knowledge necessary to impact biobanking practices and to promote participant advocacy. In addition, biobanks provide the volume, variety, veracity, and velocity of data that can address the challenges of nursing research. Nurse scientists, research nurse coordinators and clinical research and practice nurses must be informed about the various benefits and risks associated with biobanking in addition to ethical issues surrounding informed consent, participant privacy, and the release of research results. Ultimately, nurses need to possess competencies to facilitate biobanking practices both at the research bench and at the point of care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Design 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,776,335
of 24,126,099 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#743
of 5,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,193
of 361,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#38
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,126,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.