↓ Skip to main content

Eukaryotic Genomic Databases

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Eukaryotic Genomic Databases'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Identifying Sequenced Eukaryotic Genomes and Transcriptomes with diArk
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 An Introduction to the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD)
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Using the Candida Genome Database
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 PomBase: The Scientific Resource for Fission Yeast
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 EuPathDB: The Eukaryotic Pathogen Genomics Database Resource
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Ensembl Genome Browser: Strategies for Accessing Eukaryotic Genome Data
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) Is the International Resource for Information on the Laboratory Mouse
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 A Primer for the Rat Genome Database (RGD)
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Bovine Genome Database: Tools for Mining the Bos taurus Genome
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Navigating Xenbase: An Integrated Xenopus Genomics and Gene Expression Database
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Using ZFIN: Data Types, Organization, and Retrieval
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 EchinoBase: Tools for Echinoderm Genome Analyses
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Multi-Omics Database for Parasitic Nematodes and Trematodes
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Using WormBase: A Genome Biology Resource for Caenorhabditis elegans and Related Nematodes
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Using WormBase ParaSite: An Integrated Platform for Exploring Helminth Genomic Data
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Using FlyBase to Find Functionally Related Drosophila Genes
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Hymenoptera Genome Database: Using HymenopteraMine to Enhance Genomic Studies of Hymenopteran Insects
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Navigating the i5k Workspace@NAL: A Resource for Arthropod Genomes
Attention for Chapter 14: Using WormBase: A Genome Biology Resource for Caenorhabditis elegans and Related Nematodes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Using WormBase: A Genome Biology Resource for Caenorhabditis elegans and Related Nematodes
Chapter number 14
Book title
Eukaryotic Genomic Databases
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7737-6_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7736-9, 978-1-4939-7737-6
Authors

Christian Grove, Scott Cain, Wen J. Chen, Paul Davis, Todd Harris, Kevin L. Howe, Ranjana Kishore, Raymond Lee, Michael Paulini, Daniela Raciti, Mary Ann Tuli, Kimberly Van Auken, Gary Williams, The WormBase Consortium, Grove, Christian, Cain, Scott, Chen, Wen J., Davis, Paul, Harris, Todd, Howe, Kevin L., Kishore, Ranjana, Lee, Raymond, Paulini, Michael, Raciti, Daniela, Tuli, Mary Ann, Auken, Kimberly, Williams, Gary, Auken, Kimberly Van

Abstract

WormBase ( www.wormbase.org ) provides the nematode research community with a centralized database for information pertaining to nematode genes and genomes. As more nematode genome sequences are becoming available and as richer data sets are published, WormBase strives to maintain updated information, displays, and services to facilitate efficient access to and understanding of the knowledge generated by the published nematode genetics literature. This chapter aims to provide an explanation of how to use basic features of WormBase, new features, and some commonly used tools and data queries. Explanations of the curated data and step-by-step instructions of how to access the data via the WormBase website and available data mining tools are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Student > Master 5 17%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 30%
Computer Science 5 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#13,919,552
of 24,276,163 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,551
of 13,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,078
of 450,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#296
of 1,482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,276,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,668 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.