↓ Skip to main content

Disordered Vertebral and Rib Morphology in Pudgy Mice

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Disordered Vertebral and Rib Morphology in Pudgy Mice
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Disordered Vertebral and Rib Morphology in Pudgy Mice
Chapter number 4
Book title
Disordered Vertebral and Rib Morphology in Pudgy Mice
Published in
Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43151-2_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-943149-9, 978-3-31-943151-2
Authors

Shapiro, Frederic, Frederic Shapiro

Abstract

Each of the radiographic, histologic, whole mount, and three-dimensional computerized reconstruction techniques throws specific light on the vertebral, intervertebral disc, and rib abnormalities in the development of the pudgy mouse. The end result demonstrates a failure of both normal formation and normal segmentation in the pudgy mouse recognized now as a recessive genetic disorder in which mutations in the Delta-like 3 gene (Dll3) have been defined [2]. The variable appearance of the vertebral and rib abnormalities from mouse to mouse, including in particular the variable appearance in affected littermates, indicates that the gene abnormality alone does not account solely for the deformities seen. Once the gene abnormality is expressed early in embryogenesis, secondary effects, presumably by mechanisms of epigenetics, appear to play a significant role in outlining the abnormal pattern. The pudgy mouse and other genetically triggered axial developmental abnormalities represent excellent models to help unravel pathogenetic mechanisms whereby gene abnormalities are translated into three-dimensional structural abnormalities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 60%
Professor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,342,896
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#64
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,777
of 393,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.