↓ Skip to main content

Advancements of Mass Spectrometry in Biomedical Research

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Advancements of Mass Spectrometry in Biomedical Research'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Mass spectrometry for proteomics-based investigation.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 MALDI Profiling and Applications in Medicine
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Simplifying the proteome: analytical strategies for improving peak capacity.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Quantitative shotgun proteomics with data-independent acquisition and traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry: a versatile tool in the life sciences.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture (SILAC) for Quantitative Proteomics.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Utility of computational structural biology in mass spectrometry.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Affinity-Mass Spectrometry Approaches for Elucidating Structures and Interactions of Protein–Ligand Complexes
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Neurological Analyses: Focus on Gangliosides and Mass Spectrometry
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Post-translational Modifications (PTMs) and Protein-Protein Interactions (PPIs).
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Applications for Mass Spectrometry in the Study of Ion Channel Structure and Function
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A Mass Spectrometry View of Stable and Transient Protein Interactions
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Mass Spectrometry-Based Tissue Imaging of Small Molecules
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Redox proteomics: from bench to bedside.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Analysis of Fluorinated Proteins by Mass Spectrometry
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Mass spectrometry for proteomics-based investigation using the zebrafish vertebrate model system.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Mass Spectrometry-Based Biomarkers in Drug Development
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Detection of Biomedically Relevant Stilbenes from Wines by Mass Spectrometry
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Mass Spectrometric DNA Adduct Quantification by Multiple Reaction Monitoring and Its Future Use for the Molecular Epidemiology of Cancer
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Using Breast Milk to Assess Breast Cancer Risk: The Role of Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Cancer secretomes and their place in supplementing other hallmarks of cancer.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Thiostrepton, a natural compound that triggers heat shock response and apoptosis in human cancer cells: a proteomics investigation.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Using Proteomics to Unravel the Mysterious Steps of the HBV-Life-Cycle.
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Oxidative Stress and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacterial Pathogens: State of the Art, Methodologies, and Future Trends
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Proteomic approaches to dissect neuronal signaling pathways.
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Investigating a Novel Protein Using Mass Spectrometry: The Example of Tumor Differentiation Factor (TDF).
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Mass spectrometry for the study of autism and neurodevelopmental disorders.
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Biomarkers in major depressive disorder: the role of mass spectrometry.
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Application of Mass Spectrometry to Characterize Localization and Efficacy of Nanoceria In Vivo
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Bottlenecks in proteomics.
Attention for Chapter 27: Biomarkers in major depressive disorder: the role of mass spectrometry.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Biomarkers in major depressive disorder: the role of mass spectrometry.
Chapter number 27
Book title
Advancements of Mass Spectrometry in Biomedical Research
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06068-2_27
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-906067-5, 978-3-31-906068-2
Authors

Alisa G. Woods, Dan V. Iosifescu, Costel C. Darie, Woods AG, Iosifescu DV, Darie CC

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is common. Despite numerous available treatments, many individuals fail to improve clinically. MDD continues to be diagnosed exclusively via behavioral rather than biological methods. Biomarkers-which include measurements of genes, proteins, and patterns of brain activity-may provide an important objective tool for the diagnosis of MDD or in the rational selection of treatments. Proteomic analysis and validation of its results as biomarkers is less explored than other areas of biomarker research in MDD. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a comprehensive, unbiased means of proteomic analysis, which can be complemented by directed protein measurements, such as Western Blotting. Prior studies have focused on MS analysis of several human biomaterials in MDD, including human post-mortem brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), blood components, and urine. Further studies utilizing MS and proteomic analysis in MDD may help solidify and establish biomarkers for use in diagnosis, identification of new treatment targets, and understanding of the disorder. The ultimate goal is the validation of a biomarker or a biomarker signature that facilitates a convenient and inexpensive predictive test for depression treatment response and helps clinicians in the rational selection of next-step treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,478
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,495
of 4,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,016
of 305,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#75
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.