↓ Skip to main content

Tissue Engineering III: Cell - Surface Interactions for Tissue Culture

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 109: Interaction of Cells with Decellularized Biological Materials.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Interaction of Cells with Decellularized Biological Materials.
Chapter number 109
Book title
Tissue Engineering III: Cell - Surface Interactions for Tissue Culture
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/10_2011_109
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-228281-2, 978-3-64-228282-9
Authors

Wilhelmi M, Giere B, Harder M, Mathias Wilhelmi, Bettina Giere, Michael Harder, Wilhelmi, Mathias, Giere, Bettina, Harder, Michael

Abstract

The idea to create the concept of cardiovascular "tissue engineering" is based on the recognition that until then all known allogeneic/xenogeneic biological or alloplastic implant materials were associated with shortcomings, which led to graft deterioration, degradation and finally destruction. Thus, it aims to develop viable cardiovascular structures, e.g. heart valves, myocardium or blood vessels, which ideally demonstrate mechanisms of remodeling and self-repair, a high microbiological resistance, complete immunological integrity and a functional endothelial cell layer to guarantee physiological hemostasis. In our current review we aim to identify basic limitations of previous concepts, explain why the use of decellularized matrices was a logical consequence and which limitations still exist.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Researcher 5 23%
Professor 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Chemistry 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2012.
All research outputs
#18,312,024
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#146
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,652
of 241,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.