↓ Skip to main content

Tissue Engineering III: Cell - Surface Interactions for Tissue Culture

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 112: Studying Cell–Surface Interactions In Vitro: A Survey of Experimental Approaches and Techniques
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 224)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Studying Cell–Surface Interactions In Vitro: A Survey of Experimental Approaches and Techniques
Chapter number 112
Book title
Tissue Engineering III: Cell - Surface Interactions for Tissue Culture
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/10_2011_112
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-228281-2, 978-3-64-228282-9
Authors

Stefanie Michaelis, Rudolf Robelek, Joachim Wegener, Michaelis, Stefanie, Robelek, Rudolf, Wegener, Joachim

Abstract

A better understanding of the interactions of animal (or human) cells with in vitro surfaces is the key to the successful development, improvement and optimization of biomaterials for biomedical or biotechnological purposes. State-of-the-art experimental approaches and techniques are a prerequisite for further and deeper insights into the mechanisms and processes involved in cell-surface adhesion. This chapter provides a brief but not complete survey of optical, mechanical, electrochemical and acoustic devices that are currently used to study the structural and functional properties of the cell-surface junction. Each technique is introduced with respect to the underlying principles before example data are discussed. At the end of the chapter all techniques are compared in terms of their strengths, limitations and technical requirements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Master 9 22%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 29%
Engineering 5 12%
Materials Science 5 12%
Chemistry 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,383,331
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#43
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,902
of 241,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.