You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Animal Models for Dengue and Zika Vaccine Development
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 16 |
Book title |
Dengue and Zika: Control and Antiviral Treatment Strategies
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-981-10-8727-1_16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-9-81-108726-4, 978-9-81-108727-1
|
Authors |
Eduardo Alves dos Santos, Katja Fink, Alves dos Santos, Eduardo, Fink, Katja |
Abstract |
The current status of animal models in the study of dengue and Zika are covered in this review. Mouse models deficient in IFN signaling are used to overcome the natural resistance of mice to non-encephalitic flaviviruses. Conditional IFNAR mice and non-human primates (NHP) are useful immuno-competent models. Sterile immunity after dengue vaccination is not observed in NHPs. Placental and fetal development in NHPs is similar to humans, facilitating studies on infection-mediated fetal impairment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 20% |
Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,633,675
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,334
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,825
of 442,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#154
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.