↓ Skip to main content

Dengue and Zika: Control and Antiviral Treatment Strategies

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Dengue and Zika: Control and Antiviral Treatment Strategies'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Arboviruses: A Family on the Move
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Historical Perspective of Arboviruses in Mozambique and Its Implication for Current and Future Epidemics
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Reliable Serological Testing for the Diagnosis of Emerging Infectious Diseases
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Flaviviral RNA Structures and Their Role in Replication and Immunity
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Molecular Specificity of the Human Antibody Response to Dengue Virus Infections
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Structures of Zika Virus E & NS1: Relations with Virus Infection and Host Immune Responses
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Plugging the Leak in Dengue Shock
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Viral Entry and NS1 as Potential Antiviral Drug Targets
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 The Dengue Virus Replication Complex: From RNA Replication to Protein-Protein Interactions to Evasion of Innate Immunity
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 The Structure of the Zika Virus Protease, NS2B/NS3pro
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Transactions of NS3 and NS5 in Flaviviral RNA Replication
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Establishment and Application of Flavivirus Replicons
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Strategies Towards Protease Inhibitors for Emerging Flaviviruses
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Discovery of Potent Non-nucleoside Inhibitors of Dengue Viral RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase from Fragment Screening and Structure-Guided Design
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Nucleocytoplasmic Trafficking of Dengue Non-structural Protein 5 as a Target for Antivirals
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Animal Models for Dengue and Zika Vaccine Development
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Understanding the Human T Cell Response to Dengue Virus
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Regulation and Function of NK and T Cells During Dengue Virus Infection and Vaccination
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Structural Insights into the Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Target Endoplasmic Reticulum Alpha-Glucosidase II
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Mechanisms of Antiviral Activity of Iminosugars Against Dengue Virus
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Countering Zika Virus: The USAMRIID Response
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Dengue Antiviral Development: A Continuing Journey
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 An Industry Perspective on Dengue Drug Discovery and Development
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 The Use of Wolbachia by the World Mosquito Program to Interrupt Transmission of Aedes aegypti Transmitted Viruses
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Seroepidemiological Studies of Arboviruses in Africa
Attention for Chapter 25: Seroepidemiological Studies of Arboviruses in Africa
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Seroepidemiological Studies of Arboviruses in Africa
Chapter number 25
Book title
Dengue and Zika: Control and Antiviral Treatment Strategies
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-8727-1_25
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-108726-4, 978-9-81-108727-1
Authors

Eduardo Samo Gudo, S. Ali, V. S. António, I. R. Chelene, I. Chongo, M. Demanou, K. Falk, O. C. Guiliche, N. Heinrich, V. Monteiro, A. F. Muianga, J. Oludele, F. Mula, F. Mutuku, N. Amade, P. Alho, E. Betsem, Z. Chimbuinhe, A. J. Cristovam, G. Galano, A. Gessain, E. Harris, M. Heise, F. Inalda, I. Jala, E. Jaszi, C. King, U. Kitron, B. M. Kümmerer, A. D. LaBeaud, N. Lagerqvist, G. Malai, M. Mazelier, S. Mendes, D. Mukoko, B. Ndenga, R. Njouom, G. Pinto, A. Tivane, D. M. Vu, J. Vulule, Gudo, Eduardo Samo, Ali, S., António, V. S., Chelene, I. R., Chongo, I., Demanou, M., Falk, K., Guiliche, O. C., Heinrich, N., Monteiro, V., Muianga, A. F., Oludele, J., Mula, F., Mutuku, F., Amade, N., Alho, P., Betsem, E., Chimbuinhe, Z., Cristovam, A. J., Galano, G., Gessain, A., Harris, E., Heise, M., Inalda, F., Jala, I., Jaszi, E., King, C., Kitron, U., Kümmerer, B. M., LaBeaud, A. D., Lagerqvist, N., Malai, G., Mazelier, M., Mendes, S., Mukoko, D., Ndenga, B., Njouom, R., Pinto, G., Tivane, A., Vu, D. M., Vulule, J.

Abstract

The literature on sero-epidemiological studies of flaviviral infections in the African continent is quite scarce. Much of the viral epidemiology studies have been focussing on diseases such as HIV/AIDS because of their sheer magnitude and impact on the lives of people in the various affected countries. Increasingly disease outbreaks caused by arboviruses such as the recent cases of chikungunya virus, dengue virus and yellow fever virus have prompted renewed interest in studying these viruses. International agencies from the US, several EU nations and China are starting to build collaborations to build capacity in many African countries together with established institutions to conduct these studies. The Tofo Advanced Study Week (TASW) was established to bring the best scientists from the world to the tiny seaside town of Praia do Tofo to rub shoulders with African virologists and discuss cutting-edge science and listen to the work of researchers in the field. In 2015 the 1st TASW focussed on Ebola virus. The collections of abstracts from participants at the 2nd TASW which focused on Dengue and Zika virus as well as presentations on other arboviruses are collated in this chapter.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 24 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 32 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,633,675
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,334
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,825
of 442,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#154
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.