↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory Health

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 140: How Do Skeletal Muscles Die? An Overview
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
How Do Skeletal Muscles Die? An Overview
Chapter number 140
Book title
Respiratory Health
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/5584_2015_140
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-918792-1, 978-3-31-918793-8
Authors

Carmeli, Eli, Aizenbud, Dror, Rom, Oren, Eli Carmeli, Dror Aizenbud, Oren Rom

Abstract

Clarifying the confusion regarding the term "muscle death" is of great importance, especially for clinicians. In response to various stimuli, skeletal muscle may undergo pathological changes, leading to muscle atrophy and consequently resulting in the loss of muscle strength and function. Depending on the stimulus, skeletal muscles can be induced to die through different mechanisms mainly via apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis. Muscle death may occur secondary to various physiological and pathological conditions such as aging, starvation, immobilization, denervation, inflammation, muscle diseases and cancer. This overview aims to elucidate the medical terminology and pathways used to describe muscle death, which are commonly confused. In addition, some of the common pathological conditions that lead to muscle death such as cachexia and sarcopenia of aging are dwelled on.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#17,107,917
of 25,134,448 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,700
of 5,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,087
of 272,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,134,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.