You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Compositional checking of satisfaction
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
Computer Aided Verification
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-55179-4_4 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-055179-9, 978-3-54-046763-2
|
| Authors |
Andersen, Henrik Reif, Winskel, Glynn, Henrik Reif Andersen, Glynn Winskel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,650,357
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,496
of 8,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,694
of 62,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.