You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
New Ways of Deliberating Online: An Empirical Comparison of Network and Threaded Interfaces for Online Discussion
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Electronic Participation
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-662-44914-1_8 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-66-244913-4, 978-3-66-244914-1
|
| Authors |
Anna De Liddo, Simon Buckingham Shum, De Liddo, Anna, Buckingham Shum, Simon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Norway | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 228 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 57 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 36 | 16% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,812,596
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#600
of 8,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,679
of 237,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#6
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.