↓ Skip to main content

Substance and Non-substance Addiction

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Biochemical Diagnosis in Substance and Non-substance Addiction
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Biochemical Diagnosis in Substance and Non-substance Addiction
Chapter number 9
Book title
Substance and Non-substance Addiction
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5562-1_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-105561-4, 978-9-81-105562-1
Authors

Wenwen Shen, Huifeng Liu, Xiaohu Xie, Haixiong Liu, Wenhua Zhou, Shen, Wenwen, Liu, Huifeng, Xie, Xiaohu, Liu, Haixiong, Zhou, Wenhua

Abstract

An optimal biochemical marker for addiction would be some easily traced molecules in body specimens, which indicates indulgent addictive behaviors, or susceptibility to certain addictive stimuli. In this chapter, we discussed existing literature about possible biomarkers, and classified them into three categories: origin forms and metabolites of substances, markers from biochemical responses to certain addiction, and genetic and epigenetic biomarkers suggesting susceptibility to addiction. In every category, we examined studies concerning certain type of addiction one by one, with focuses mainly on opiates, psychostimulants, and pathological gambling. Several promising molecules were highlighted, including those of neurotrophic factors, inflammatory factors, and indicators of vascular injury, and genetic and epigenetic biomarkers such as serum miRNAs. DNA methylation signatures and signal nucleotide polymorphism of candidate gene underlying the addiction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Librarian 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Psychology 5 13%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,944,820
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,113
of 4,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,592
of 421,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#314
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.