↓ Skip to main content

Long Non-coding RNAs in Human Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 486: Form and Function of Exosome-Associated Long Non-coding RNAs in Cancer
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Form and Function of Exosome-Associated Long Non-coding RNAs in Cancer
Chapter number 486
Book title
Long Non-coding RNAs in Human Disease
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/82_2015_486
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-923906-4, 978-3-31-923907-1
Authors

Chris Hewson, Kevin V. Morris, Hewson, Chris, Morris, Kevin V

Abstract

The recent discovery that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are functional and are not merely "transcriptional noise" has spawned an entirely new arena of investigation. LncRNAs have been found to be functional in the regulation of a wide variety of genes, including those involved in cancer. Studies have identified that lncRNAs play a role in the development and regulation of cancer and can also act as prognostic markers. Meanwhile, exosomes , which are extracellular particles generated endogenously by cells, have been observed to act as transport vesicles for a variety of biological components, particularly proteins and RNAs. This transportation of biological components has been shown to impact a variety of biological processes including the development of cancer. Collectively, these observations, along with those of several recent studies, suggest that lncRNAs and exosomes may function together to disseminate cell signals that alter and/or control local cellular microenvironments. This review will identify the various roles that lncRNAs and exosomes play in cancer development, as well as the possibility that exosomes may transfer functional lncRNAs between cells as a means of cell-to-cell communication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 28%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,831,413
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#415
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,038
of 395,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#26
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.