You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Use of phage display for the identification of molecular sensors specific for activated rho.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 19 |
Book title |
Rho GTPases
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-442-1_19 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-441-4, 978-1-61779-442-1
|
Authors |
Chinestra P, Lajoie-Mazenc I, Faye JC, Favre G, Patrick Chinestra, Isabelle Lajoie-Mazenc, Jean-Charles Faye, Gilles Favre, Chinestra, Patrick, Lajoie-Mazenc, Isabelle, Faye, Jean-Charles, Favre, Gilles |
Abstract |
We describe a phage display approach to select active Rho-specific scFv sensors. This in vitro technique allows preserving the antigen conformation stability all along the selection process. We used the GTP locked RhoBQ63L mutant as antigen against the Griffin.1 library composed of a human synthetic V(H) + V(L) scFv cloned in the pHEN2 phagemid vector. The method described here has permitted to identify an scFv that discriminates between the activated and the inactivated form of the Rho subfamily. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 25% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#5,441,381
of 25,944,331 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,585
of 14,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,239
of 249,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#85
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,944,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,480 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.