Marek Eliáš, Vladimír Klimeš, Eliáš, Marek, Klimeš, Vladimír
Abstract
Rho GTPases constitute a significant subgroup of the eukaryotic Ras superfamily of small GTPases implicated in the regulation of diverse cellular processes, such as the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton, establishment, and maintenance of cell polarity and membrane trafficking. Whereas a few eukaryotes lack Rho genes, a majority of species typically bear multiple Rho paralogs, raising a question about the origin of the family and the paths of its diversification in individual eukaryotic lineages. In this chapter, we ruminate on several aspects of the evolutionary history of the Rho family and methodological challenges of its reconstruction. First, we provide an updated survey of Rho GTPases in diverse eukaryotic branches, demonstrating almost ubiquitous occurrence of Rho genes across the eukaryotic phylogeny most consistent with the presence of at least one Rho gene already in the last eukaryotic common ancestor. Second, we discuss the obstacles in reconstructing the history of gene duplications giving rise to the extant diversity of Rho paralogs in different species, and point to numerous limitations posed by the current phylogenetic methodology. Third, as a case study demonstrating various issues of data collection, phylogenetic analyses and interpretations of trees, we present an analysis of the Rho family in the fungal kingdom, revealing the existence of at least four separate paralogs (Cdc42, Rac, Rho1, and Rho4) in early fungi and subsequent potentially independent expansions of the family in different fungal subgroups. We conclude with the warning that the currently dominating perception of the Rho phylogeny is biased by the metazoan (and especially vertebrate) perspective, and a new, more global view is to be worked out when a better genome sampling and more adequate methods of phylogenetic inference are employed.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2011.
All research outputs
#20,591,413
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,923
of 14,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,385
of 255,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#344
of 492 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 492 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
