You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
In Vitro Selection of Unnatural Cyclic Peptide Libraries via mRNA Display.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 21 |
| Book title |
Ribosome Display and Related Technologies
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-379-0_21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-378-3, 978-1-61779-379-0
|
| Authors |
Ma Z, Hartman MC, Zhong Ma, Matthew C. T. Hartman |
| Abstract |
The ribosomal synthesis of drug-like peptides containing unnatural amino acids is possible due to the broad substrate specificity of the ribosome. In this protocol, a reconstituted Escherichia coli ribosomal translation system (PURE) is adapted to incorporate unnatural amino acids into mRNA-displayed peptide libraries, which are used in in vitro selection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 38% |
| Researcher | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 33% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,813
of 13,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,097
of 238,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#306
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.