Chapter title |
Dual-model automatic detection of nerve-fibres in corneal confocal microscopy images.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 37 |
Book title |
Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2010
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-15705-9_37 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-215704-2, 978-3-64-215705-9
|
Authors |
Dabbah, M A, Graham, J, Petropoulos, I, Tavakoli, M, Malik, R A, Dabbah, M. A., Graham, J., Petropoulos, I., Tavakoli, M., Malik, R. A., M. A. Dabbah, J. Graham, I. Petropoulos, M. Tavakoli, R. A. Malik |
Abstract |
Corneal Confocal Microscopy (CCM) imaging is a non-invasive surrogate of detecting, quantifying and monitoring diabetic peripheral neuropathy. This paper presents an automated method for detecting nerve-fibres from CCM images using a dual-model detection algorithm and compares the performance to well-established texture and feature detection methods. The algorithm comprises two separate models, one for the background and another for the foreground (nerve-fibres), which work interactively. Our evaluation shows significant improvement (p approximately 0) in both error rate and signal-to-noise ratio of this model over the competitor methods. The automatic method is also evaluated in comparison with manual ground truth analysis in assessing diabetic neuropathy on the basis of nerve-fibre length, and shows a strong correlation (r = 0.92). Both analyses significantly separate diabetic patients from control subjects (p approximately 0). |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
Hungary | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 80 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Professor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 33% |
Computer Science | 11 | 13% |
Engineering | 8 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 28 | 32% |