↓ Skip to main content

Current Understanding and Treatment of Gliomas

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Low-grade glioma.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 168)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Low-grade glioma.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Current Understanding and Treatment of Gliomas
Published in
Cancer treatment and research, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12048-5_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-912047-8, 978-3-31-912048-5
Authors

Kumthekar P, Raizer J, Singh S, Priya Kumthekar, Jeffrey Raizer, Simran Singh, Kumthekar, Priya, Raizer, Jeffrey, Singh, Simran

Abstract

Low-grade gliomas are slower growing than their high-grade counterparts. They account for 10-20 % of all primary brain tumors. Median survival is between 4.7 and 9.8 years. The goal of treatment is to prolong overall survival while maintaining good quality of life (QOL). Recent data favors early surgical resection. EOR is associated with delayed tumor recurrence and improved survival. Additional therapy with chemotherapy or radiation is indicated in patients with high-risk features. Lower doses (between 45 and 50.4 Gy) have been shown to be as effective without adverse effects compared to higher doses. Recent trials have shown benefit in combining chemotherapy with radiation compared to radiation alone. The optimal chemotherapeutic regimen (PCV or temozolomide (TMZ)) remains unknown, although TMZ is easier to administer and better tolerated by patients. Novel molecular markers including 1p/19q chromosomal codeletion and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation have been correlated with treatment response and survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 25 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,813,826
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Cancer treatment and research
#22
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,424
of 363,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer treatment and research
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.