You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox
|
---|---|
Published by |
Springer, Dordrecht, January 1979
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-94-015-7629-1 |
ISBNs |
978-9-04-818354-8, 978-9-40-157629-1
|
Editors |
Maurice Allais, Ole Hagen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 27 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |