Report for: Intracranial Pressure & Neuromonitoring XVI

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Chapter title	Analysis of a Minimally Invasive Intracranial Pressure Signals During Infusion at the Subarachnoid Spinal Space of Pigs
Chapter number	16
Book title	Intracranial Pressure & Neuromonitoring XVI
Published in	Acta neurochirurgica Supplement, January 2018
DOI	10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_16
Pubmed ID	29492536
Book ISBNs	978-3-31-965797-4, 978-3-31-965798-1
Authors	G. Frigieri, R. A. P. Andrade, C. C. Wang, D. SpavieriJr., L. Lopes, R. Brunelli, D. A. Cardim, R. M. M. Verzola, S. Mascarenhas, D. Spavieri, Frigieri, G., Andrade, R. A. P., Wang, C. C., Spavieri, D., Lopes, L., Brunelli, R., Cardim, D. A., Verzola, R. M. M., Mascarenhas, S.
Abstract	We developed a new minimally invasive method for intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPMI). The objective of this project is to verify the similarities between the ICPMI and the invasive method (ICPInv), for different components of the intracranial pressure signal-namely, the mean value (trend) as well as its pulsatile component. A 9 kg anesthetized pig was used for simultaneous ICP monitoring with both methods. ICP was increased by performing ten infusions of 6 ml 0.9% saline into the spinal subarachnoid space, using a catheter implanted in the lumbar region. For correlation analysis, the signals were decomposed into two components-trend and pulsatile signals. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between ICPInv and ICPMI. During the infusions, the correlation between the pulsatile components of the signals was above 0.5 for most of the time. The signal trends showed a good agreement (correlation above 0.5) for most of the time during infusions. The ICPMI signal trends showed a good linear agreement with the signal obtained invasively. Based on the waveform analysis of the pulsatile component of ICP, our results indicate the possibility of using the minimally invasive method for assessing the neuroclinical state of the patient.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Unknown	18	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Doctoral Student	4	22%
Student > Ph. D. Student	3	17%
Student > Master	2	11%
Student > Bachelor	2	11%
Researcher	2	11%
Other	2	11%
Unknown	3	17%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	4	22%
Neuroscience	3	17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	1	6%
Nursing and Health Professions	1	6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science	1	6%
Other	4	22%
Unknown	4	22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.

All research outputs

#20,466,701

of 23,025,074 outputs

Outputs from Acta neurochirurgica Supplement

#144

of 190 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#378,203

of 442,363 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Acta neurochirurgica Supplement

of 22 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.

So far Altmetric has tracked 190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

Intracranial Pressure

Table of Contents

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context