↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic Network Reconstruction and Modeling

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Metabolic Network Reconstruction and Modeling'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Reconstructing High-Quality Large-Scale Metabolic Models with merlin
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Analyzing and Designing Cell Factories with OptFlux
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The MONGOOSE Rational Arithmetic Toolbox
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 The FASTCORE Family: For the Fast Reconstruction of Compact Context-Specific Metabolic Networks Models
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Reconstruction and Analysis of Central Metabolism in Microbes
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Using PSAMM for the Curation and Analysis of Genome-Scale Metabolic Models
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Integration of Comparative Genomics with Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling to Investigate Strain-Specific Phenotypical Differences
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Template-Assisted Metabolic Reconstruction and Assembly of Hybrid Bacterial Models
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Integrated Host-Pathogen Metabolic Reconstructions
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Metabolic Model Reconstruction and Analysis of an Artificial Microbial Ecosystem
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 RNA Sequencing and Analysis in Microorganisms for Metabolic Network Reconstruction
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Differential Proteomics Based on 2D-Difference In-Gel Electrophoresis and Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Elucidation of Biological Processes in Antibiotic-Producer Bacterial Strains
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Techniques for Large-Scale Bacterial Genome Manipulation and Characterization of the Mutants with Respect to In Silico Metabolic Reconstructions
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Computational Prediction of Synthetic Lethals in Genome-Scale Metabolic Models Using Fast-SL
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Coupling Fluxes, Enzymes, and Regulation in Genome-Scale Metabolic Models
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Dynamic Flux Balance Analysis Using DFBAlab
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Designing Optimized Production Hosts by Metabolic Modeling
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Optimization of Multi-Omic Genome-Scale Models: Methodologies, Hands-on Tutorial, and Perspectives
Attention for Chapter 6: Using PSAMM for the Curation and Analysis of Genome-Scale Metabolic Models
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Using PSAMM for the Curation and Analysis of Genome-Scale Metabolic Models
Chapter number 6
Book title
Metabolic Network Reconstruction and Modeling
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7528-0_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7527-3, 978-1-4939-7528-0
Authors

Keith Dufault-Thompson, Jon Lund Steffensen, Ying Zhang

Abstract

PSAMM is an open source software package that supports the iterative curation and analysis of genome-scale models (GEMs). It aims to integrate the annotation and consistency checking of metabolic models with the simulation of metabolic fluxes. The model representation in PSAMM is compatible with version tracking systems like Git, which allows for full documentation of model file changes and enables collaborative curations of large, complex models. This chapter provides a protocol for using PSAMM functions and a detailed description of the various aspects in setting up and using PSAMM for the simulation and analysis of metabolic models. The overall PSAMM workflow outlined in this chapter includes the import and export of model files, the documentation of model modifications using the Git version control system, the application of consistency checking functions for model curations, and the numerical simulation of metabolic models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,708,425
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,497
of 13,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,760
of 444,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#600
of 1,502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,338 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.