You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
A Tabu Search Hyper-heuristic Approach to the Examination Timetabling Problem at the MARA University of Technology
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 16 |
| Book title |
Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling V
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, August 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/11593577_16 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-030705-1, 978-3-54-032421-8
|
| Authors |
Graham Kendall, Naimah Mohd Hussin, Kendall, Graham, Hussin, Naimah Mohd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Angola | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 30 | 54% |
| Engineering | 7 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#20,246,428
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,981
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,586
of 58,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#26
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.