You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Selection of Borrelia burgdorferi Promoter Sequences Active During Mammalian Infection Using In Vivo Expression Technology
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
Borrelia burgdorferi
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7383-5_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7382-8, 978-1-4939-7383-5
|
| Authors |
Philip P. Adams, Mollie W. Jewett |
| Abstract |
In vivo expression technology (IVET) has been applied to a variety of organisms to identify active promoters in specific environments or growth conditions of interest. Here, we describe modifications to employ this genome-wide screening method for Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete, during an active murine infection. Utilization of this technique provides valuable insights into the B. burgdorferi transcriptome during infection, despite the low bacterial numbers in the mammalian host environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 40% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 20% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,366,228
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,222
of 13,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,399
of 442,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#432
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.