↓ Skip to main content

Translational Informatics in Smart Healthcare

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Tongue Image Analysis and Its Mobile App Development for Health Diagnosis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Tongue Image Analysis and Its Mobile App Development for Health Diagnosis
Chapter number 5
Book title
Translational Informatics in Smart Healthcare
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5717-5_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-105716-8, 978-9-81-105717-5
Authors

Ratchadaporn Kanawong, Tayo Obafemi-Ajayi, Dahai Liu, Meng Zhang, Dong Xu, Ye Duan, Kanawong, Ratchadaporn, Obafemi-Ajayi, Tayo, Liu, Dahai, Zhang, Meng, Xu, Dong, Duan, Ye

Abstract

Computer-aided diagnosis provides a medical procedure that assists physicians in interpretation of medical images. This work focuses on computer-aided tongue image analysis specifically, based on Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Tongue diagnosis is an important component of TCM. Computerized tongue diagnosis can aid medical practitioners in capturing quantitative features to improve reliability and consistency of diagnosis. Recently, researchers have started to develop computer-aided tongue analysis algorithms based on new advancement in digital photogrammetry, image analysis, and pattern recognition technologies. In this chapter, we will describe our recent work on tongue image analysis as well as a mobile app that we developed based on this technology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Computer Science 3 12%
Engineering 3 12%
Psychology 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,737,238
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,265
of 5,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,850
of 423,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#121
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.