↓ Skip to main content

Translational Informatics in Smart Healthcare

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Physical Exercise Prescription in Metabolic Chronic Disease
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Physical Exercise Prescription in Metabolic Chronic Disease
Chapter number 6
Book title
Translational Informatics in Smart Healthcare
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5717-5_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-105716-8, 978-9-81-105717-5
Authors

Laura Stefani, Giorgio Galanti, Stefani, Laura, Galanti, Giorgio

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome as a consequence of the association to overweight, hypertension, and diabetes is at high risk of coronary events. Regular physical training has been recently promoted to reduce cardiovascular risks factors, by the improved lifestyle and also by the "anti-inflammatory effectiveness." A positive impact has been shown in case of cancer survived patients either with or without comorbidities and especially in those subjects where the inflammatory process is globally represented. The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines and more recently a new Italian model both support the role of "exercise as therapy" at moderate level of energy expenditure. The importance to establish the individual level of physical exercise, like a drug's dose, has induced authors in investigating this aspect in diverse diseases and in different clinical fields associated to an incorrect lifestyle habits. To reach this goal, a specific research strategy is important to spread the knowledge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 40 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 18%
Sports and Recreations 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 47 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,117,945
of 24,001,212 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,204
of 5,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,899
of 427,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#192
of 491 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,001,212 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 491 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.