↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Inflammatory Signaling in Health and Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: The Development and Diversity of ILCs, NK Cells and Their Relevance in Health and Diseases
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Development and Diversity of ILCs, NK Cells and Their Relevance in Health and Diseases
Chapter number 11
Book title
Regulation of Inflammatory Signaling in Health and Disease
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5987-2_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-105986-5, 978-9-81-105987-2
Authors

Yuxia Zhang, Bing Huang, Zhang, Yuxia, Huang, Bing

Abstract

Next to T and B cells, natural killer (NK) cells are the third largest lymphocyte population. They are recently re-categorized as innate lymphocytes (ILCs), which also include ILC1, ILC2, ILC3, and the lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cells. Both NK cells and ILC1 cells are designated as group 1 ILCs because they secrete interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF). However, in contrast to ILC1 and all other ILCs, NK cells possess potent cytolytic functions that resemble cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). In addition, NK cells express, in a stochastic manner, an array of germ line-encoded activating and inhibitory receptors that recognize the polymorphic regions of major histocompatibility class I (MHC-I) molecules and self-proteins. Recognition of self renders NK cell tolerance to self-healthy tissues, but fail to recognize self ('missing-self') leads to activation to neoplastic transformation and infections of certain viruses. In this chapter, we will summarize the development of NK cells in the context of ILCs, describe the diversity of phenotype and function in blood and tissues, and discuss their involvement in health and diseases in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,351,873
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#991
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,998
of 421,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#88
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.