↓ Skip to main content

Translational Informatics in Smart Healthcare

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Interactions Between Genetics, Lifestyle, and Environmental Factors for Healthcare
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Interactions Between Genetics, Lifestyle, and Environmental Factors for Healthcare
Chapter number 8
Book title
Translational Informatics in Smart Healthcare
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5717-5_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-105716-8, 978-9-81-105717-5
Authors

Yuxin Lin, Jiajia Chen, Bairong Shen

Abstract

The occurrence and progression of diseases are strongly associated with a combination of genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Understanding the interplay between genetic and nongenetic components provides deep insights into disease pathogenesis and promotes personalized strategies for people healthcare. Recently, the paradigm of systems medicine, which integrates biomedical data and knowledge at multidimensional levels, is considered to be an optimal way for disease management and clinical decision-making in the era of precision medicine. In this chapter, epigenetic-mediated genetics-lifestyle-environment interactions within specific diseases and different ethnic groups are systematically discussed, and data sources, computational models, and translational platforms for systems medicine research are sequentially presented. Moreover, feasible suggestions on precision healthcare and healthy longevity are kindly proposed based on the comprehensive review of current studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 18 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,639,283
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#394
of 4,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,345
of 421,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#35
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.