You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Genetic modification of mouse effector and helper T lymphocytes expressing a chimeric antigen receptor.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 16 |
| Book title |
Cancer Vaccines
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-0345-0_16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-0344-3, 978-1-4939-0345-0
|
| Authors |
John LB, Chee TM, Gilham DE, Darcy PK, John, Liza B., Chee, Tess M., Gilham, David E., Darcy, Phillip K., Liza B. John, Tess M. Chee, David E. Gilham, Phillip K. Darcy |
| Abstract |
Genetic modification of primary mouse T cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) has emerged as an important tool for optimizing adoptive T cell immunotherapy strategies. However, limitations in current protocols for generating highly pure and sufficient numbers of enriched effector and helper CAR(+) T cell subsets remain problematic. Here, we describe a new retroviral transduction protocol for successfully generating transduced CD8(+) and CD4(+) T lymphocytes for in vitro and in vivo characterization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,506,192
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,289
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,296
of 307,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#55
of 637 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 637 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.