↓ Skip to main content

Multiple Sclerosis: Bench to Bedside

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Role of Oligodendrocyte Dysfunction in Demyelination, Remyelination and Neurodegeneration in Multiple Sclerosis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Role of Oligodendrocyte Dysfunction in Demyelination, Remyelination and Neurodegeneration in Multiple Sclerosis
Chapter number 7
Book title
Multiple Sclerosis: Bench to Bedside
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47861-6_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-947860-9, 978-3-31-947861-6
Authors

Adriana Octaviana Dulamea, Dulamea, Adriana Octaviana

Abstract

Oligodendrocytes (OLs) are the myelinating cells of the central nervous system (CNS) during development and throughout adulthood. They result from a complex and well controlled process of activation, proliferation, migration and differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) from the germinative niches of the CNS. In multiple sclerosis (MS), the complex pathological process produces dysfunction and apoptosis of OLs leading to demyelination and neurodegeneration. This review attempts to describe the patterns of demyelination in MS, the steps involved in oligodendrogenesis and myelination in healthy CNS, the different pathways leading to OLs and myelin loss in MS, as well as principles involved in restoration of myelin sheaths. Environmental factors and their impact on OLs and pathological mechanisms of MS are also discussed. Finally, we will present evidence about the potential therapeutic targets in re-myelination processes that can be accessed in order to develop regenerative therapies for MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 19%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 46 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 11%
Neuroscience 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 46 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,166,179
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,063
of 5,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,165
of 421,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#177
of 491 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 491 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.