↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Neurobiology of Eating Disorders

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 89: Dopamine-based reward circuitry responsivity, genetics, and overeating.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Dopamine-based reward circuitry responsivity, genetics, and overeating.
Chapter number 89
Book title
Behavioral Neurobiology of Eating Disorders
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/7854_2010_89
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-215130-9, 978-3-64-215131-6
Authors

Stice E, Yokum S, Zald D, Dagher A, Eric Stice, Sonja Yokum, David Zald, Alain Dagher

Editors

Roger A.H. Adan, Walter H. Kaye

Abstract

Data suggest that low levels of dopamine D2 receptors and attenuated responsivity of dopamine-target regions to food intake is associated with increased eating and elevated weight. There is also growing (although mixed) evidence that genotypes that appear to lead to reduced dopamine signaling (e.g., DRD2, DRD4, and DAT) and certain appetite-related hormones and peptides (e.g., ghrelin, orexin A, leptin) moderate the relation between dopamine signaling, overeating, and obesity. This chapter reviews findings from studies that have investigated the relation between dopamine functioning and food intake and how certain genotypes and appetite-related hormones and peptides affect this relation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 3%
United States 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 100 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor 9 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 23%
Neuroscience 13 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,173,534
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#64
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,944
of 180,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.