↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Research and Practice

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 19: Seroprevalence of Bartonella Species in Patients with Ocular Inflammation
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Seroprevalence of Bartonella Species in Patients with Ocular Inflammation
Chapter number 19
Book title
Clinical Research and Practice
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-965444-7, 978-3-31-965445-4
Authors

Brydak-Godowska, Joanna, Kopacz, Dorota, Borkowski, Piotr K., Fiecek, Beata, Hevelke, Agata, Rabczenko, Daniel, Tylewska-Wierzbanowska, Stanisława, Kęcik, Dariusz, Chmielewski, Tomasz, Joanna Brydak-Godowska, Dorota Kopacz, Piotr K. Borkowski, Beata Fiecek, Agata Hevelke, Daniel Rabczenko, Stanisława Tylewska-Wierzbanowska, Dariusz Kęcik, Tomasz Chmielewski

Abstract

Bartonella species, vector-borne etiologic agents of many systemic or self-limited infections, are responsible for a widening spectrum of diseases in humans, including inflammatory conditions of the eye. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is any relationship between uveitis and the evidence of Bartonella spp. infection in the serum, ocular fluid, and cataract mass in patients with intraocular inflammation. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based tests and DNA sequencing were performed on surgery-extracted specimens of intraocular fluid and lens mass of 33 patients. Sera from 51 patients and 101 control subjects were tested for the presence of specific antibodies against Bartonella spp. Neither IgM-class antibodies against Bartonella spp. nor Bartonella spp. DNA were detected. A specific IgG-class antibody was found in 33.3% of the patients with uveitis. The rate of positive Bartonella serology was higher among the uveitis patients than that in control subjects. This high rate may in part result from unrecognized indirect mechanisms rather than the immediate presence and multiplication of Bartonella spp. in the eyeball. Nonetheless we believe that screening for Bartonella spp. should become part of the diagnostic workup in uveitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Mathematics 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,420,242
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,982
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,139
of 310,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#86
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.