↓ Skip to main content

Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Reflection in Agile Retrospectives
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 What Influences the Speed of Prototyping? An Empirical Investigation of Twenty Software Startups
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Key Challenges in Agile Requirements Engineering
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Mo...
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Comparing Requirements Decomposition Within the Scrum, Scrum with Kanban, XP, and Banana Development Processes
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Effects of Technical Debt Awareness: A Classroom Study
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Don’t Forget to Breathe: A Controlled Trial of Mindfulness Practices in Agile Project Teams
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Enhancing Agile Team Collaboration Through the Use of Large Digital Multi-touch Cardwalls
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Knowledge Sharing in a Large Agile Organisation: A Survey Study
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Teaching Agile Methods to Software Engineering Professionals: 10 Years, 1000 Release Plans
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Are Software Startups Applying Agile Practices? The State of the Practice from a Large Survey
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Adopting Test Automation on Agile Development Projects: A Grounded Theory Study of Indian Software Organizations
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 How is Security Testing Done in Agile Teams? A Cross-Case Analysis of Four Software Teams
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 An Assessment of Avionics Software Development Practice: Justifications for an Agile Development Process
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Inoculating an Agile Company with User-Centred Design: An Empirical Study
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 On the Usage and Benefits of Agile Methods & Practices
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Checklists to Support Test Charter Design in Exploratory Testing
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Discovering Software Process Deviations Using Visualizations
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Exploring Workflow Mechanisms and Task Allocation Strategies in Agile Software Teams
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Are Daily Stand-up Meetings Valuable? A Survey of Developers in Software Teams
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Knowledge Management and Reflective Practice in Daily Stand-Up and Retrospective Meetings
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Self-Assignment: Task Allocation Practice in Agile Software Development
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Software Development Practices Patterns
Attention for Chapter 2: What Influences the Speed of Prototyping? An Empirical Investigation of Twenty Software Startups
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
What Influences the Speed of Prototyping? An Empirical Investigation of Twenty Software Startups
Chapter number 2
Book title
Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming
Published in
arXiv, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57633-6_2
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-957632-9, 978-3-31-957633-6
Authors

Anh Nguyen-Duc, Xiaofeng Wang, Pekka Abrahamsson, Anh Nguyen Duc

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Student > Bachelor 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 33 48%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 19%
Engineering 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,474,161
of 14,079,326 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#183,760
of 540,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,520
of 265,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#7,836
of 19,400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,079,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540,656 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19,400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.