↓ Skip to main content

Macrophages

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 13: Activation of Macrophages in Response to Biomaterials
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 217)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Activation of Macrophages in Response to Biomaterials
Chapter number 13
Book title
Macrophages
Published in
Results and problems in cell differentiation, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-54090-0_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-954089-4, 978-3-31-954090-0
Authors

Jamie E. Rayahin, Richard A. Gemeinhart, Rayahin, Jamie E., Gemeinhart, Richard A.

Editors

Malgorzata Kloc

Abstract

Macrophages are the initial biologic responders to biomaterials. These highly plastic immune sentinels control and modulate responses to materials, foreign or natural. The responses may vary from immune stimulatory to immune suppressive. Several parameters have been identified that influence macrophage response to biomaterials, specifically size, geometry, surface topography, hydrophobicity, surface chemistry, material mechanics, and protein adsorption. In this review, the influence of these parameters is supported with examples of both synthetic and naturally derived materials and illustrates that a combination of these parameters ultimately influences macrophage responses to the biomaterial. Having an understanding of these properties may lead to highly efficient design of biomaterials with desirable biologic response properties.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Chemistry 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,526,794
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#29
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,609
of 310,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.