↓ Skip to main content

Macrophages

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Role for Mechanotransduction in Macrophage and Dendritic Cell Immunobiology. - PubMed - NCBI
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Role for Mechanotransduction in Macrophage and Dendritic Cell Immunobiology. - PubMed - NCBI
Chapter number 9
Book title
Macrophages
Published in
Results and problems in cell differentiation, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-54090-0_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-954089-4, 978-3-31-954090-0
Authors

Mennens, Svenja F B, van den Dries, Koen, Cambi, Alessandra, Svenja F. B. Mennens, Koen van den Dries, Alessandra Cambi, Mennens, Svenja F. B., Dries, Koen

Editors

Malgorzata Kloc

Abstract

Tissue homeostasis is not only controlled by biochemical signals but also through mechanical forces that act on cells. Yet, while it has long been known that biochemical signals have profound effects on cell biology, the importance of mechanical forces has only been recognized much more recently. The types of mechanical stress that cells experience include stretch, compression, and shear stress, which are mainly induced by the extracellular matrix, cell-cell contacts, and fluid flow. Importantly, macroscale tissue deformation through stretch or compression also affects cellular function.Immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells are present in almost all peripheral tissues, and monocytes populate the vasculature throughout the body. These cells are unique in the sense that they are subject to a large variety of different mechanical environments, and it is therefore not surprising that key immune effector functions are altered by mechanical stimuli. In this chapter, we describe the different types of mechanical signals that cells encounter within the body and review the current knowledge on the role of mechanical signals in regulating macrophage, monocyte, and dendritic cell function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Other 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,457,417
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#96
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,779
of 310,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.