Chapter 1 Bayesian Argumentation: The Practical Side of Probability

Chapter 3 Why Are We Convinced by the Ad Hominem Argument?: Bayesian Source Reliability and Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules

Chapter 4 A Survey of Uncertainties and Their Consequences in Probabilistic Legal Argumentation

Chapter 5 Was It Wrong to Use Statistics in R v Clark? A Case Study of the Use of Statistical Evidence in Criminal Courts

Chapter 6 A Bayesian Simulation Model of Group Deliberation and Polarization

Chapter 7 Degrees of Justification, Bayes’ Rule, and Rationality

Chapter 8 Argumentation with (Bounded) Rational Agents

Chapter 9 Reductio, Coherence, and the Myth of Epistemic Circularity

Chapter 10 On Argument Strength

Chapter 11 Upping the Stakes and the Preface Paradox